New Laws in China Could Protect Individual Land Rights

Landesa land rights specialist Li Ping in Chongqing China

While Landesa’s recent 17-province survey of farmers found a worrying upswing in farmland loss across much of China, there is some good news for China’s farmers and proponents of rule of law.

The Chinese central government is revising its land laws starting with the rules regarding urban land and later is expected to revise the rules regarding rural land. The revisions, so far, are tackling some of the most troublesome aspects of China’s current land regulations.

In January, the State Council promulgated historic new regulations that will provide urban property owners in China with unprecedented rights.

First, the new urban takings law, (formally known as The Regulation of Expropriation of and Compensation for Housing Properties on State Owned Land) for the first time in China’s legislative history, explicitly defined the “needs of public interest” with regard to eminent domain. Prior to this, the government could legally take property for merely “needs of public interest.” This vagueness gave local authorities free reign to expropriate immovable private property essentially for any purpose.

Landesa has long advocated for a more narrow definition of public interest. This would have the dual effect of increasing property rights protections in China and expanding the rule of law.

Second, the new urban takings law, also for the first time at the national level, adopts a “minimum approach” with regard to compensation.

Prior to this, China’s compensation law provided a compensation ceiling but no minimum. This effectively deprived urban citizens of the right to negotiate with the government for fair compensation.

The change creates legal space for urban citizens to truly negotiate for their compensation.

Moreover, the new urban takings law provides a number of measures to protect property owners’ procedural rights, including allowing property owners to go directly to court to settle disputes over compensation, requiring governments to apply to court for decisions on compulsory eviction and prohibiting the government from using force even in compulsory evictions.

Although these laws are currently applicable only to urban expropriations, the legal principles established under the urban takings law have profound implications for both the expansion of rule of law in China and the forthcoming revisions to the Land Management Law that will apply to rural land. Honestly, even if the forthcoming revisions of Land Management Law adopt only these two main changes, it would be a huge step forward for farmers’ land rights in China and provide farmers with the land tenure security they need to invest in their land and build a better future for themselves, their families, and their communities.

For the latest findings of our survey of farmers’ land rights across 17 provinces in rural China, visit our 2011 China survey page.

For more information about the global land rush, visit our Global Land Rush page.

Li Ping

About Li Ping

Li Ping is a senior attorney for Landesa’s China team and one of the leading authorities on land-related law in China. He has assisted the Chinese government in drafting and implementing laws and regulations governing farmers’ land rights, and provided consultancy to international development organizations in formulating policies on tenure security for farmers, land expropriation and resettlement. He has extensive land tenure experience, including forestland tenure, tenure security, land tenure law, eminent domain law, resettlement law and policy, regulatory takings, compensation valuation, land use law, land policy, and land-related institutional expertise in developing countries. He conducted numerous rounds of rural fieldwork throughout China, and has experience working with Chinese government agencies and academic institutions to reduce poverty through land reforms. He also has farming experience in China.
This entry was posted in Land Acquisitions, Land Rights and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to New Laws in China Could Protect Individual Land Rights

  1. fantastic post, very informative. I wonder why the opposite specialists of this sector don’t realize this. You should proceed your writing. I’m confident, you’ve a huge readers’ base already!

  2. הפקעת קרקעות says:

    Really nice and informative blog for all! Absolutely true! Not only China, but other countries like Israel are also facing the issues and disputes of land expropriation. So government must establish rules regarding urban land and rural land development fulfilling Land development law for compensation for expropriation for land.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

From Our Blog

Jen Duncan

Women in Tanzania set for equal land rights – let’s make sure it happens

By Jen Duncan and Scholastica Haule This post first appeared in the Guardian’s Poverty Matters blog on October 15, 2014. In a milestone for Tanzania, the country’s proposed new constitution provides women with equal rights to own and use land. …
Read More

Tim Hanstad

We need to redefine ambition

This post was originally produced for the Skoll World Forum blog on October 13, 2014. When I announced a few weeks ago that, after 10 years as president and CEO of Landesa, I would be stepping down and transitioning into a …
Read More

Melany Grout

5 girls who said NO to child marriage in West Bengal

This photo essay originally appeared on ONE.org. The Girls Project, a partnership between the government of West Bengal and Landesa, aims to keep girls in school and reduce their vulnerability to child marriage. More than 40,000 girls are currently participating in …
Read More

On Twitter