
Why guidance on human rights grievances in Landscape and Jurisdictional initiatives (LJIs)?
Respect for human rights is a key element of any LJI. LJIs, as complex multi-stakeholder processes can create significant benefits, but they can also pose risks to people if rights and interests are not adequately respected during an LJI’s interventions.
A social safeguarding and human rights grievance guidance for LJIs helps ensure that landscape-level sustainability efforts do not create or worsen negative impact on people, while providing clear processes to protect rights, address complaints, strengthen stakeholder trust, and improve the effectiveness and credibility of the initiative.
For more information on social safeguarding, check out Proforest’s companion Social Safeguarding in LJIs guidance.
Guidance on HR Grievance mechanism in LJIs
Even with strong safeguards, grievances may still occur. When an initiative causes or contributes to a grievance, it is responsible for addressing the issue and providing remedy. Grievances are claims of harm experienced by individuals or groups, making clear and accessible resolution mechanisms essential. While grievances can relate to both human rights and environmental impacts, this guidance focuses on human rights issues.
Establishing a grievance mechanism is considered good practice and is increasingly expected under social safeguard requirements. This is reflected in the Core Criteria for Mature Landscape Initiatives, endorsed by more than 20 landscape organisations, and is increasingly required by funders, including members of the Consumer Goods Forum’s Forest Positive Coalition, as part of landscape engagement and due diligence expectations.
Download the Guidance (pdf)Related resources


