BlogLand Rights

Get Monthly Updates

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Sep 07

Macro-impact of Micro-plots

A micro-plot in Dorko Village of West Bengal, India

From the Philippines to South Africa, developing countries are pouring huge resources into providing housing for their poorest citizens.

This is a valiant effort and should be applauded.

But it can also be improved upon.

Using an innovation that is rather simple and affordable.

There is an extensive body of research that shows that providing the poor with not only housing but also a small plot of land surrounding their new home dramatically boosts the impact of such poverty alleviation programs.

Here’s how: by providing families with a home on a small plot of land, about the size of a tennis court, governments can provide not only the security of a home and bargaining leverage in labor markets, but also a place to grow vegetables and fruit, enhanced nutrition, a place to start a home business, and a place to store inventory or keep livestock. Landesa helped pioneer this micro-plot model.

Home garden plots also have the added benefit that they can provide women with significant control over household assets. Sale of micro-plot produce is often one of the only sources of independent income for women in the developing world. And it is often one of the few ways for them to ensure that their children’s nutritional needs are met.

The small plots of land necessary for such an improvement don’t require dramatic rethinking of current programs. And they don’t require so much land as to be physically or economically unfeasible.

India has had great success with its micro-plot program and thus far almost half a million families have benefited from programs in states from Odisha to West Bengal.

In Russia, in the 1970s and 1980s about two to three percent of all arable land was held in small “household auxiliary plots” or on “dacha plots” and produced 25 to 30 percent of the total value of agricultural production.  Today, these small private plots (now fully privately owned) occupy about five percent of arable land, and produce  more than 50 percent of the total value of agricultural production.

Studies have found this to be the case from South Africa to Russia and China to Bangladesh – small plots produce big returns.

About The Author

Roy Prosterman is Founder and Chairman Emeritus of Landesa (formerly the Rural Development Institute), a non-governmental organization designed specifically for partnering with governments to extend land rights to the world’s poorest people. He is also Professor Emeritus at the University of Washington law school in Seattle, where he joined the faculty in 1965. Since 1967, Prosterman has provided advice and conducted research on land tenure issues in more than 40 countries in Asia, the former Soviet Union, Europe, the Middle East and Latin America. He has received numerous awards and distinctions including the Gleitsman International Activist Award, the Schwab Foundation’s Outstanding Global Social Entrepreneur award, the World Affairs Council World Citizen Award, and the inaugural Henry R. Kravis Prize in Leadership. Prosterman is a frequent guest speaker and presenter at world forums on poverty and economic security. He has published several books, including Land Reform and Democratic Development (with Jeffrey Riedinger) and One Billion Rising (authored and edited with Tim Hanstad and Robert Mitchell), and has authored numerous articles. He continues to be actively engaged in Landesa’s research and advisory work.He is a graduate of the University of Chicago (B.A., 1954) and Harvard Law School (J.D., 1958). Before beginning his work on global development, he practiced as an associate at the New York firm of Sullivan & Cromwell for six years.


  1. Godfrey Massay
    September 9, 2011 at 5:33 AM · Reply

    Thank you for this Prof Roy.

  2. What a Little Land Can Do -
    November 21, 2012 at 4:01 AM · Reply

    […] 1970s and 1980s, small dacha garden plots made up 3 percent of the agricultural land but produced 25 to 30 percent of Russia’s agricultural value.  “They kept that country fed,” said Hanstad.In 2000, Landesa […]

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *